Saunders v. The Law Offices of Elaine Van Beveren et al

Filing 33

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/14/2011. The 10/20/2011 Hearing notice by plaintiff is VACATED. (Marciel, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

ROBERT SAUNDERS,

11

Plaintiff,

12
13
14

No. 2:10-cv-02559 GEB KJN PS

v.
THE COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO,
CALIFORNIA; THE LAW OFFICES
OF ELAINE VAN BEVEREN; ELAINE
VAN BEVEREN, Individually,

15
Defendants.
16

ORDER
/

17

On October 12, 2011, plaintiff filed a document entitled “Objections to Magistrate

18

Judge’s Order In Re Plaintiff’s Allegation of Judicial Bias,” and noticed a hearing before the

19

undersigned on October 20, 2011 (Dkt. No. 31).1 Although unclear in most respects, plaintiff’s

20

“objections” do not actually seek any concrete relief relative to the undersigned’s order entered

21

September 29, 2011, which addressed plaintiff’s allegation of judicial bias (Dkt. No. 26).

22

Instead, plaintiff’s objections more directly address proposed findings and recommendations that

23

the undersigned filed on July 13, 2011 (Dkt. No. 22), which were fully adopted by the district

24

judge assigned to this case on September 6, 2011 (Dkt. No. 25).

25
1

26

This action proceeds before the undersigned pursuant to Eastern District of California
Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
1

1
2
3
4

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the October 20, 2011 hearing
noticed by plaintiff is vacated.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: October 14, 2011

5
6
7

_____________________________________
KENDALL J. NEWMAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2