Solomon v. Solomon et al

Filing 49

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/1/11 ORDERING that the CWR Defendants' request to appear telephonically is GRANTED. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Case No. 2:10-cv-02565-KJM-KJN 11 12 Plaintiffs, 13 vs. 14 15 16 17 18 19 Defendants. 20 21 Defendants Cal-Western Reconveyance Corporation, LSI Title Company, and Marco E-LOAN INC., MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., LENDERS FIRST CHOICE TRUSTEE 1, WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, CALWESTERN RECONVEYANCE CORPORATION, LSI TITLE COMPANY, MARCO MARQUEZ, JOHN KENNERTY, DOES I-XX, Inclusive, et al., ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS CAL-WESTERN RECONVEYANCE CORPORATION, LSI TITLE COMPANY, AND MARCO MARQUEZ'S REQUEST TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY SEAN PATRICK SOLOMON and KAREN J. SOLOMON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Hearing: Date: March 3, 2011 Time: 10:00 a.m. Crtm: 25 Judge: Hon. Mag. Kendall J. Newman 22 Marquez (collectively, the "CWR Defendants") have requested permission to appear telephonically 23 at the combined hearing on defendant E-Loan, Inc. and defendants Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., John 24 Kennerty, and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.'s respective Motions to Dismiss for 25 Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted set for March 3, 2011, at 10:00 a.m., in 26 Courtroom 25 of the above-captioned court. Having taken this request under consideration, and good 27 cause appearing therefor, 28 /././ -1CASE NO. 2:10-cv-02565-KJM-KJN [PROPOSED] ORDER ON REQUEST TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY 1 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the CWR Defendants' request to appear telephonically is 2 GRANTED. 3 DATED: March 1, 2011 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2CASE NO. 2:10-cv-02565-KJM-KJN [PROPOSED] ORDER ON REQUEST TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?