Smith v. Sacramento Main Courthouse, et al

Filing 10

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 5/19/11, ORDERING that 8 plaintiff's motion for the case to remain in the Eastern District of CA, is DENIED as unnecessary. (Kastilahn, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

KENNETH A. SMITH,

11

Plaintiff,

12
13

No. CIV S-10-2566 MCE DAD PS

v.
SACRAMENTO MAIN
COURTHOUSE, et al.,

ORDER

14
Defendants.
15

/

16

Plaintiff, Kenneth A. Smith, proceeding pro se, has filed a motion requesting that

17

this matter remain in the Eastern District of California. (Doc. No. 8.) The transfer of this matter

18

is not currently being contemplated. Plaintiff’s motion will therefore be denied as unnecessary.

19

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s October 5, 2010 motion

20

for the case to remain in the Eastern District of California (Doc. No. 8) is denied as unnecessary.

21

DATED: May 19, 2011.

22
23
24
25

DAD:6
Ddad1\orders.prose\smith2566.trans.ord

26
1