Johnson et al v. Bank United FSB et al

Filing 18

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 4/15/11 ORDERING that Plaintiffs failed to respond to the 16 March 8th Order by this deadline. Therefore, Defendants Bank United F.S.B. and Freestand Financial are dismissed from this action without prejudice.(Duong, D)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

Carolina Johnson and Claude
Colwell,

11

Plaintiffs,

12
13
14
15
16

v.
Bank United F.S.B., Bank United,
Freestand Financial, and Does 150, inclusive,
Defendants.
________________________________

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

2:10-cv-02567-GEB-KJN
ORDER OF DISMISSAL

17

Plaintiffs were required to respond to an Order filed March 8,

18

2011 (“March 8th Order”), by either filing proof that Defendants Bank

19

United F.S.B. and Freestand Financial were served with process or a

20

document showing good cause for Plaintiffs’ failure to serve these

21

Defendants within the 120-day period prescribed in Federal Rule of Civil

22

Procedure 4(m). (ECF No. 16.) This filing was due no later than 4:00

23

p.m. on March 14, 2011.

24

failure to make the required showing by the deadline would result in

25

Defendants Bank United F.S.B. and Freestand Financial being dismissed

26

from this action.

27

///

28

///

Id.

The March 8th Order warned Plaintiffs that

1

1

Plaintiffs failed to respond to the March 8th Order by this

2

deadline.

3

Financial are dismissed from this action without prejudice.

4
5

Therefore,

Defendants

Bank

United

F.S.B.

and

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

April 15, 2011

6
7
8

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.
United States District Judge

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2

Freestand