Grow Scene Productions, LLC v. Haze Consulting, Inc. et al

Filing 73

STIPULATION and ORDER 72 signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/1/12 ORDERING that dispositional documents in the above matter shall be filed by no later than 10/31/2012. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 ALAN KORN, SBN 167933 LAW OFFICE OF ALAN KORN 1840 Woolsey Street Berkeley, California 94703 Ph. (510) 548-7300; Fax: (510) 540-4821 Attorney for Plaintiff Grow Scene Productions, LLC 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 GROW SCENE PRODUCTIONS, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Plaintiff, v. HAZE CONSULTING, INC., a California Corporation, TROY W. GOINGS, an individual dba GET ME GOINGS PRODUCTIONS, SAMUEL TRUJILLO, an individual, ROBERT PYNE, an individual, SARELI MARKETING, INC., a California Corporation and MARLO JORDON, an individual. Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE No. 10-CV-02573-KJN STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE DISPOSITIONAL DOCUMENTS 17 18 Pursuant to Rule 143 of the Civil Local Rules of the United States District Court, Eastern 19 District of California, Plaintiff Grow Scene Productions, LLC (“Plaintiff”) on the one hand, and 20 Defendants Haze Consulting, Inc., Troy W. Goings, Samuel Trujillo, Robert Pyne and Marlo 21 Jordon (“Defendants”) on the other hand, hereby stipulate as follows: 22 WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendants are engaged in negotiating a written settlement 23 agreement incorporating the terms and conditions that were verbally entered into the record at the 24 July 25, 2012 Settlement Conference in the above matter; and 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS the Court issued a Minute Order dated July 26, 2012 requiring the parties to file dispositional documents by no later than August 31, 2012; and WHEREAS this Court on September 5, 2012 previously granted the parties Stipulation and 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE DISPOSITIONAL DOCUMENTS CASE NO.: CASE No. 10-CV-02573-KJN 1 [Proposed] Order requiring dispositive documents to be filed by no later than September 28, 2012; 2 and 3 4 5 6 WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendants agree that additional time is needed for the parties to negotiate and finalize their settlement agreement; and WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendants agree that the extension of time to file dispositional documents will not alter the date of any other event or deadline already fixed by the Court; 7 NOW THEREFORE, Plaintiff and Defendants, by and through their respective 8 undersigned counsel or representing themselves in pro per, hereby stipulate as follows: 9 10 11 12 1.0 The time for the parties to file dispositional documents shall be extended to and including October 31, 2012. SO STIPULATED. DATED: September 24, 2012 LAW OFFICE OF ALAN KORN 13 By: 14 15 /Alan Korn/ Alan Korn Attorneys for Plaintiff GROW SCENE PRODUCTIONS, LLC 16 17 DATED: September 27, 2012 GEORGE W.M. MULL 18 By: 19 20 21 /George Mull/ (as authorized on September 27, 2012) George Mull Attorneys for Defendants HAZE CONSULTING, INC., SAMULE TRUJILLO, ROBERT PYNE and MARLO JORDON 22 23 24 25 DATED: September 24, 2012 TROY GOINGS By: /Troy Goings (as authorized on September 24, 2012) Troy Goings Defendant, in Pro Per 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE DISPOSITIONAL DOCUMENTS CASE NO.: CASE No. 10-CV-02573-KJN 1 2 3 [PROPOSED] ORDER 4 5 6 Pursuant to the foregoing Stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that dispositional documents in the above matter shall be filed by no later than October 7 8 31, 2012. 9 Dated: October 1, 2012 10 11 12 ___/s/ Kendall J. Newman________ Hon. Kendall J. Newman Magistrate Judge of the United States District Court Eastern District of California 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE DISPOSITIONAL DOCUMENTS CASE NO.: CASE No. 10-CV-02573-KJN

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?