Alcantar v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 19

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 1/3/12 ORDERING that the FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS filed 12/7/11 18 are ADOPTED. Plaintiff's MOTION for Summary Judgment 14 is GRANTED in part; Defendant's Cross-MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT 15 is DENIED; The case is REMANDED for further proceedings under sentence four of 42 U.S.C.§ 405(g); CASE CLOSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ELVIA H. ALCANTAR, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 No. CIV-S-10-2638 GEB GGH vs. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, ORDER 14 15 Defendant. __________________________________/ 16 On December 7, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 17 herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the 18 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed. 19 Accordingly, the court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. 20 United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 21 reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 22 1983). 23 The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, 24 concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the proposed Findings and Recommendations in full. 25 \\\\\ 26 \\\\\ 1 1 2 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Findings and Recommendations filed December 7, 2011 (dkt. no. 18), are ADOPTED and 3 1. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (dkt. no. 14) is granted in part; 4 2. Defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment (dkt. no. 15) is denied; 5 3. The case is remanded for further proceedings under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 6 7 8 § 405(g); and 4. Judgment is entered for plaintiff. Dated: January 3, 2012 9 10 11 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?