Alcantar v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 24

STIPULATION and ORDER 23 signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 2/16/2012 GRANTING plaintiff's 22 Motion for Attorney's Fees pursuant to Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA). Plaintiff is awarded $4218.25 in attorney fees. This award is without prejudice to rights of plaintiff's counsel to seek Social Security Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406, subject to provisions of the EAJA. (Marciel, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney DONNA CALVERT Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration BRENDA M. PULLIN Special Assistant United States Attorney Social Security Administration 5 6 7 333 Market Street, Suite 1500 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 977-8975 Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 E-Mail: Brenda.Pullin@ssa.gov 8 9 Attorneys for Defendant 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 ELVIA H. ALCANTAR, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, ) Commissioner of ) Social Security, ) ) Defendant. ) _________________________________) CIVIL NO. 2:10-cv-2638-GEB-GGH STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEY FEES UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT (28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)) 20 21 22 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their undersigned counsel, 23 subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff be awarded attorney fees under the Equal Access to 24 Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), in the amount of FOUR THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED 25 EIGHTEEN DOLLARS AND TWENTY-FIVE CENTS ($4,218.25). This amount represents 26 compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this 27 civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). 28 1 2 After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees and expenses to Plaintiff, the government will 3 consider the matter of Plaintiff’s assignment of EAJA fees and expenses to Plaintiff’s attorney. Pursuant 4 to Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 2010 WL 2346547 (U.S. June 14, 2010), the ability to honor the 5 assignment will depend on whether the fees and expenses are subject to any offset allowed under the 6 United States Department of the Treasury’s Offset Program. After the order for EAJA fees and expenses 7 is entered, the government will determine whether they are subject to any offset. 8 Fees and expenses shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the Treasury 9 determines that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause the payment of 10 fees and expenses to be made directly to the Law Offices of Terry LaPorte, pursuant to the assignment 11 executed by Plaintiff. Any payments made shall be delivered to Plaintiff’s counsel. 12 This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff’s request for EAJA attorney fees 13 and expenses, and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant under the EAJA. 14 Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any and all claims 15 that Plaintiff and/or Plaintiff’s counsel may have relating to EAJA attorney fees and expenses in 16 connection with this action. 17 18 This award is without prejudice to the rights of Plaintiff’s counsel to seek Social Security Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406, subject to the provisions of the EAJA. Respectfully submitted, 19 20 Dated: February 16, 2012 /s/ Kevan H. Spence (As authorized via e-mail) KEVAN H. SPENCE Attorney for Plaintiff Dated: February 15, 2012 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney 21 22 23 24 26 /s/ Brenda M. Pullin BRENDA M. PULLIN Special Assistant U.S. Attorney 27 Attorneys for Defendant 25 28 2 - Stip & Order for EAJA Fees ORDER 1 2 APPROVED AND SO ORDERED. 3 4 Dated: February 16, 2012 5 6 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 - Stip & Order for EAJA Fees

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?