Alcantar v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
24
STIPULATION and ORDER 23 signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 2/16/2012 GRANTING plaintiff's 22 Motion for Attorney's Fees pursuant to Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA). Plaintiff is awarded $4218.25 in attorney fees. This award is without prejudice to rights of plaintiff's counsel to seek Social Security Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406, subject to provisions of the EAJA. (Marciel, M)
1
2
3
4
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
DONNA CALVERT
Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration
BRENDA M. PULLIN
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Social Security Administration
5
6
7
333 Market Street, Suite 1500
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: (415) 977-8975
Facsimile: (415) 744-0134
E-Mail: Brenda.Pullin@ssa.gov
8
9
Attorneys for Defendant
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
ELVIA H. ALCANTAR,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
)
Commissioner of
)
Social Security,
)
)
Defendant.
)
_________________________________)
CIVIL NO. 2:10-cv-2638-GEB-GGH
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
AWARDING ATTORNEY FEES UNDER
THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT
(28 U.S.C. § 2412(d))
20
21
22
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their undersigned counsel,
23
subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff be awarded attorney fees under the Equal Access to
24
Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), in the amount of FOUR THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED
25
EIGHTEEN DOLLARS AND TWENTY-FIVE CENTS ($4,218.25). This amount represents
26
compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this
27
civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d).
28
1
2
After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees and expenses to Plaintiff, the government will
3
consider the matter of Plaintiff’s assignment of EAJA fees and expenses to Plaintiff’s attorney. Pursuant
4
to Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 2010 WL 2346547 (U.S. June 14, 2010), the ability to honor the
5
assignment will depend on whether the fees and expenses are subject to any offset allowed under the
6
United States Department of the Treasury’s Offset Program. After the order for EAJA fees and expenses
7
is entered, the government will determine whether they are subject to any offset.
8
Fees and expenses shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the Treasury
9
determines that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause the payment of
10
fees and expenses to be made directly to the Law Offices of Terry LaPorte, pursuant to the assignment
11
executed by Plaintiff. Any payments made shall be delivered to Plaintiff’s counsel.
12
This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff’s request for EAJA attorney fees
13
and expenses, and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant under the EAJA.
14
Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any and all claims
15
that Plaintiff and/or Plaintiff’s counsel may have relating to EAJA attorney fees and expenses in
16
connection with this action.
17
18
This award is without prejudice to the rights of Plaintiff’s counsel to seek Social Security Act
attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406, subject to the provisions of the EAJA.
Respectfully submitted,
19
20
Dated: February 16, 2012
/s/ Kevan H. Spence
(As authorized via e-mail)
KEVAN H. SPENCE
Attorney for Plaintiff
Dated: February 15, 2012
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
21
22
23
24
26
/s/ Brenda M. Pullin
BRENDA M. PULLIN
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
27
Attorneys for Defendant
25
28
2 - Stip & Order for EAJA Fees
ORDER
1
2
APPROVED AND SO ORDERED.
3
4
Dated: February 16, 2012
5
6
GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.
United States District Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3 - Stip & Order for EAJA Fees
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?