Jones v. Ballesteros et al
Filing
42
ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 1/18/13 ADOPTING in full 35 Findings and Recommendations and DENYING 39 Motion for Reconsideration. Defendant Lee is DISMISSED from this action without prejudice. (Meuleman, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JEREMY JONES,
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
15
16
17
No. 2:10-cv-2661 KJM EFB P
vs.
BALLESTEROS, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
/
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action
18
seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate
19
Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On October 24, 2012, the magistrate judge filed an order and findings and
21
recommendations, which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that
22
any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days from
23
the date the findings and recommendations were served. Plaintiff has filed objections to the
24
findings and recommendations that discuss the order; the court construes the discussion of the
25
order as a motion for reconsideration.
26
1
1
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule
2
304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the file,
3
the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the
4
proper analysis.
5
In addition, under Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge’s order shall be upheld
6
unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the file, the magistrate judge’s
7
ruling was not clearly erroneous or contrary to law.
8
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
9
1. The findings and recommendations filed October 24, 2012 are adopted in full;
10
2. Defendant Lee is dismissed from this action without prejudice; and
11
3. The motion for reconsideration is denied.
12
DATED: January 18, 2013.
13
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?