Jones v. Ballesteros et al
Filing
49
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 05/20/13 recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
JEREMY JONES,
Plaintiff,
11
vs.
12
13
No. 2:10-cv-2661 KJM EFB P
BALLESTEROS, et al.,
Defendants.
14
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
/
15
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42
16
17
U.S.C. § 1983. On November 30, 2012, defendants filed a motion for summary judgment and
18
informed plaintiff of the requirements for opposing a motion for summary judgment. See Fed. R.
19
Civ. P. 56; Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 962-63 (9th Cir. 1998). Despite numerous
20
extensions of time, plaintiff has not filed an opposition or a statement of no opposition to the
21
motion. Plaintiff has been warned that failure to do so could result in a recommendation that this
22
action be dismissed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). On April 15, 2013, the court granted plaintiff a
23
final 30-day extension of time to respond to defendants’ motion. The time for acting has passed
24
and plaintiff has not filed an opposition, a statement of no opposition, or otherwise responded to
25
the court’s order.
26
////
1
1
Plaintiff has been warned that he must file a response to defendants’ motion. Plaintiff
2
has disobeyed this court’s orders and failed to prosecute this action. The appropriate action is
3
dismissal without prejudice.
4
5
Accordingly, it is hereby RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without
prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); E.D. Cal. Local Rule 110, 183(b).
6
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge
7
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days
8
after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written
9
objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned
10
“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections
11
within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v.
12
Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
13
Dated: May 20, 2013.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?