Jones v. Ballesteros et al
Filing
63
ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/25/13 ADOPTING IN FULL 61 Findings and Recommendations; DENYING 38 Motion for Summary Judgment. (Meuleman, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JEREMY JONES,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:10-cv-2661-KJM-EFB P
v.
ORDER
BALLESTEROS, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
17
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided
19
by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On August 27, 2013, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which
20
21
were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the
22
findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Defendants have filed
23
objections to the findings and recommendations.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this
24
25
court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the file, the court
26
finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis.
27
/////
28
/////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed August 27, 2013, are adopted in full; and
3
2. Defendant Choplin’s November 30, 2012 motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 38)
4
is denied.
5
DATED: September 25, 2013.
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?