Miller v. Ives

Filing 17

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 4/19/11. Petitioner shall show cause within 21 days as to why his failure to oppose the 16 Motion to Dismiss should not be deemed a waiver of opposition. (Manzer, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 CLARK A. MILLER, 6 7 Petitioner, No. 2:10-cv-2665 FCD JFM (HC) vs. 8 RICHARD IVES, Warden, 9 Respondent. ORDER / 10 On February 14, 2011, respondent filed a motion to dismiss this action as 11 12 successive. Petitioner has not filed an opposition to the motion. Local Rule 230(l) provides in 13 part: “Failure of the responding party to file written opposition or to file a statement of no 14 opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion . . . .” Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner show cause, 15 16 within twenty-one days, why his failure to oppose respondent’s February 14, 2011 motion to 17 dismiss should not be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion, and file 18 an opposition to the motion to dismiss. Petitioner is cautioned that failure to respond to the 19 instant order, or to file an opposition to the pending motion to dismiss, will result in a 20 recommendation that this action be dismissed. 21 DATED: April 19, 2011. 22 23 24 25 26 /014;mill2665.osc 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?