Fonseca v. City of Red Bluff

Filing 15

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 4/15/11 DENYING 14 Ex Parte Application filed by Judith Fonseca for an order continuing the hearing on defendants' motion to compel. (Matson, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JUDITH FONSECA, 12 13 14 15 16 17 No. CIV S-10-2685-MCE-CMK Plaintiff, vs. ORDER CITY OF RED BLUFF, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff, who is proceeding with retained counsel, brings this civil action. 18 Pending before the court is plaintiff’s ex parte application (Doc. 14) for an order continuing the 19 hearing on defendants’ motion to compel, currently set for May 5, 2011. 20 Plaintiff cites two reasons for granting a continuance. First, plaintiff argues that 21 she was never served with the discovery requests as to which defendants seek an order 22 compelling responses. The court observes that this is an argument better made in the context of 23 opposing defendants’ motion rather than in the context of a request for a continuance. Moreover, 24 even assuming that plaintiff is correct, the court does not see how this fact would present good 25 cause for a continuance. As a second reason for a continuance, plaintiff cites her counsel’s 26 motion to withdraw, set for hearing on May 19, 2011, arguing that the motion to compel should 1 1 be heard after the motion to withdraw is decided. Again, the court does not see how this 2 establishes good cause for a continuance. Whether counsel is permitted to withdraw is an issue 3 entirely separate from whether defendants’ motion to compel should be heard as noticed or 4 continued. 5 6 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion (Doc. 14) for an ex parte order continuing the hearing on defendants’ motion to compel is denied. 7 8 9 10 DATED: April 15, 2011 ______________________________________ CRAIG M. KELLISON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?