Watts v. Flory et al

Filing 20

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 9/15/11 denying 19 Motion for a court-ordered deadline. (Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

TIMOTHY WATTS,
Plaintiff,

11
12

vs.

13

No. CIV S-10-2688 GEB CKD P

S. FLORY, et al.,
Defendants.

14

ORDER
/

15

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a motion entitled “Motion to

16
17

Attend Law Library.” In his motion, plaintiff alleges that court orders are necessary before he

18

can use the law library and he therefore requests that the court issue an order granting him

19

“Preferred Legal User” status.

20

Plaintiff does not allege that he is under a present obligation to submit documents

21

within a time certain and thus has not demonstrated that his right of access to the courts is being

22

impaired. The court will not set a deadline merely for the purpose of insuring the plaintiff

23

additional library time.

24

/////

25

/////

26

/////
1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for a court-

1
2
3

ordered deadline (Docket No. 19) is denied.
Dated: September 15, 2011

4

_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

5
6
7
8
9

/mp
watt2688.80

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2