Watts v. Flory et al

Filing 35

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 3/26/13 ORDERING the findings and recommendations filed 1/28/13, are adopted in full; this action is dismissed with prejudice as to defendants Flory, Mini, Rios, Johnson, Masuret, Baker, Guches, and Lieber; and the Clerk of Court shall amend the docket to reflect that this action proceeds against defendants Virga and Macomber only. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TIMOTHY WATTS, 11 Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 No. 2:10-cv-2688 GEB CKD P S. FLORY, et al, 14 Defendants. 15 ORDER / 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 19 On January 28, 2013, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 20 herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections 21 to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed 22 objections to the findings and recommendations. 23 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 25 ORDERED that: 26 ///// 1 1 2 3 4 5 1. The findings and recommendations filed January 28, 2013, are adopted in full; and 2. This action is dismissed with prejudice as to defendants Flory, Mini, Rios, Johnson, Masuret, Baker, Guches, and Lieber; and 3. The Clerk of Court shall amend the docket to reflect that this action proceeds 6 against defendants Virga and Macomber only. 7 Dated: March 26, 2013 8 9 10 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. Senior United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?