Willliams v. Aramark Food Services

Filing 15

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/1/11: Recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice. F&R are submitted to the United States District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections to F&R due within fourteen days. (Kaminski, H)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

THOMAS G. WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff,

11
vs.

12
13

No. CIV S-10-2769 KJM DAD P

ARAMARK FOOD SERVICES,
Defendants.

14

FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS
/

15

By order filed July 18, 2011, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days

16
17

leave to file an amended complaint was granted. Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to do so

18

would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has now

19

expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s

20

order.

21
22
23

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed
without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

24

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen

25

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections

26

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings
1

1

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified

2

time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153

3

(9th Cir. 1991).

4

DATED: September 1, 2011.

5
6
7
8

DAD:9
will2769.fta

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2