King v. McDonald et al

Filing 42

ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 2/10/12 ORDERING that the findings and recommendations filed December 7, 2011, are adopted in full; and Plaintiff's August 1, 2011 motion for injunctive relief 34 is denied. (Becknal, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

JESSE KING,

11
12
13
14

Plaintiff,
vs.
MIKE MCDONALD, et al.,
Defendants.

15
16

No. 2:10-cv-2797 JAM DAD (PC)

ORDER
/

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

17

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

18

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

19

On December 7, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

20

herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any

21

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff

22

has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

23

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule

24

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

25

file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by

26

proper analysis.
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed December 7, 2011, are adopted in

3

full; and

4

2. Plaintiff’s August 1, 2011 motion for injunctive relief (Docket No. 34) is

5

denied.

6

DATED: February 10, 2012

7
/s/ John A. Mendez
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2