Becker et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA, Inc. et al

Filing 240

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/17/2015 ORDERING that the hearing on Plaintiff's 237 AMENDED MOTION for approval to post a supersedeas bond is set for 4/9/2015 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 25 (KJN) before Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman. Defendant shall file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to plaintiffs amended motion by no later than 3/26/2015. Plaintiff may file a reply by no later than 4/2/2015. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DENNLY R. BECKER, et al., 12 Plaintiffs, 13 14 No. 2:10-cv-2799-TLN-KJN PS ORDER v. WELLS FARGO BANK, NA, INC., et al., 15 Defendants. 16 On March 10, 2015, plaintiff submitted a filing styled as a withdrawal of his February 20, 17 18 2015 motion for approval to post a supersedeas bond. (ECF No. 237.) Attached to this 19 withdrawal is what appears to be an amended version of plaintiff’s February 20, 2015 motion for 20 approval to post a supersedeas bond. (ECF No. 237-1.) Construed liberally, it appears that 21 plaintiff made his withdrawal filing in an attempt to amend his February 20, 2015 motion for 22 approval to post supersedeas bond. Accordingly, the court construes it as such. Plaintiff now 23 proceeds on his amended motion for approval to post a supersedeas bond, filed at ECF No. 237-1. 24 A hearing on plaintiff’s amended motion is set for April 9, 2015, at 10:00 a.m., in 25 Courtroom 25 (KJN) before the undersigned. Defendant shall file an opposition or statement of 26 non-opposition to plaintiff’s amended motion by no later than March 26, 2015. Plaintiff may file 27 a reply by no later than April 2, 2015. 28 //// 1 1 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 17, 2015 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?