Becker et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA, Inc. et al
Filing
264
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 8/18/2015 ORDERING that the 260 findings and recommendations are ADOPTED. Defendant's 250 motion for disbursement of bond funds is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to disburse $ 84,335.00 of the preliminary injunction bond funds to Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, NA., Inc.. The Clerk of Court is directed to refund to Plaintiff Dennly R. Becker any funds remaining in the preliminary injunction bond account after the disbursement to Defendant. (cc: Financial) (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DENNLY R. BECKER, et al,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:10-cv-2799-TLN-KJN PS
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al,
Defendants.
16
17
On June 09, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF No.
18
260) herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to
19
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. On June 22, 2015,
20
Plaintiff filed objections to the proposed findings and recommendations (ECF No. 261),
21
Defendant filed a response on July 07, 2015 (ECF No. 262), and Plaintiff filed a reply to the
22
response on July 14, 2015 (ECF No. 263). These filings have been considered by the court.
23
This court reviews de novo those portions of the proposed findings of fact to which an
24
objection has been made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore
25
Business Machines, 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920 (1982); see
26
also Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009). As to any portion of the proposed
27
findings of fact to which no objection has been made, the court assumes its correctness and
28
decides the motions on the applicable law. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th
1
1
Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi
2
Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983).
3
The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing,
4
concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the proposed findings and recommendations in full.
5
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:
6
1. The Proposed Findings and Recommendations filed June 09, 2015, are ADOPTED;
7
2. Defendant’s motion for disbursement of bond funds (ECF No. 250) is granted;
8
3. The Clerk of Court is directed to disburse $84,335.00 of the preliminary injunction
9
bond funds to Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, NA., Inc.; and
10
4. The Clerk of Court is directed to refund to Plaintiff Dennly R. Becker any funds
11
remaining in the preliminary injunction bond account after the disbursement to Defendant.
12
13
Dated: August 18, 2015
14
15
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?