Becker et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA, Inc. et al
Filing
280
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 02/02/17 ORDERING that plaintiff shall deposit a cashier's check in the amount of $188,706.43 with the Clerk within 10 days; the Court shall HOLD the funds until such time as the Court issues an order disbursing the supersedeas bond; the Court's (#278) Minute Order re the disbursement of the supersedeas bond is STRICKEN (cc: Financial). (Benson, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DENNLY R. BECKER, et al.,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:10-cv-02799-TLN-KJN
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. INC., et al.,
Defendant.
16
17
This matter is before the Court with regards to the disbursement of two bonds. On
18
December 14, 2010, Plaintiff received a Preliminary Injunction preventing Defendant from
19
foreclosing on Plaintiff’s loans. (ECF No. 21.) The Court set a $500 bond and later amended the
20
bond to require that Plaintiff make monthly payments in the amount of $3,645 for the duration of
21
the injunction. (ECF Nos. 21 & 121.) Plaintiff made monthly payments from October 2010 to
22
October 2014 resulting in a total of $91,635 when the case concluded with Defendant’s motion
23
for summary judgment. Plaintiff appealed the Court’s order granting summary judgment in favor
24
of Defendant and the Court held the bond pending the outcome of the appeal. (ECF No. 205.)
25
On October 7, 2014, Defendant moved for an award of attorney’s fees. (ECF No. 213.) On
26
February 5, 2015, the Court granted Defendant’s request for attorney’s fees in the amount of
27
$146,493.50. (ECF No. 227.) Plaintiff subsequently appealed the Court’s award of attorney’s
28
fees and moved to place the attorney’s fees in a supersedeas bond with the Court. (ECF Nos. 230
1
1
& 232.) The Court granted Plaintiff’s motion to post a supersedeas bond with regards to the
2
award of attorney’s fees in the amount of $188,706.43. (ECF No. 248.)
3
On December 7, 2016, this Court found that the appeals in the instant action had all
4
concluded. The Court noted the only remaining issue was the disbursement of the two bonds held
5
by the Court pending the conclusion of the appeals. (ECF No. 277.) The Court ordered the
6
disbursement of the preliminary injunction bond such that Defendant received $84,335 and
7
Plaintiff received “any funds remaining in the preliminary injunction bond account after the
8
disbursement to Defendant.” (ECF No. 264 at 2.) The Court did not direct the disbursement of
9
the supersedeas bond.
10
Plaintiff notified the Court by email on January 30, 2017, that he believed that he had
11
mistakenly received the funds from the supersedeas bond when the Court clerk disbursed the
12
remaining funds of the preliminary injunction bond. In order to correct this error, Plaintiff
13
suggests that he should submit a cashier’s check to the court clerk in the amount of $188,706.43.
14
The Court agrees with Plaintiffs proposed approach.
15
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
16
1.
Plaintiff shall deposit a cashier’s check in the amount of $188,706.43 with the
17
Clerk of Court within ten (10) days of this order. The Court shall hold the funds until such time
18
as the Court issues an order disbursing the supersedeas bond.
19
2.
The Clerk is directed to notify the financial department of this order.
20
3.
The Court’s Minute Order (ECF No. 278) regarding the disbursement of the
21
22
23
supersedeas bond is hereby STRICKEN.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 2, 2017
24
25
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?