Harper v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 29

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 1/6/2012 ORDERING that on 8/25/2011, the court directed plaintiff to show cause in writing why this action should not be dismissed for failure to file a dispositive motion, as required by the court's scheduling order. Plaintiff filed a response on 9/26/2011, and then filed his dispositive motion on 9/28/2011. The order to show cause is, therefore, DISCHARGED. (Zignago, K.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

STEVEN GEORGE HARPER,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. CIV S-10-2819-CMK

vs.

ORDER

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY,

15
Defendant.
16
/
17
18

Plaintiff, who is proceeding with retained counsel, brings this action for judicial

19

review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). On

20

August 25, 2011, the court directed plaintiff to show cause in writing why this action should not

21

be dismissed for failure to file a dispositive motion, as required by the court’s scheduling order.

22

Plaintiff filed a response on September 26, 2011, and then filed his dispositive motion on

23

September 28, 2011. The order to show cause is, therefore, discharged.

24

///

25

///

26

///
1

1

IT IS SO ORDERED.

2
3
4
5

DATED: January 6, 2012
______________________________________
CRAIG M. KELLISON
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2