Stein v. Bank of America, N.A., et al.,

Filing 37

STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr., on 5/18/11. The status (pretrial scheduling) conference set for 5/23/11 is hereby VACATED. All discovery is DUE by 10/11/11. Designation of Expert Witnesses is DUE by 5/20/1 1 and any rebuttal expert disclosure is DUE by 7/13/11. The last hearing date for motions shall be 12/21/11, at 9:00 a.m. The Final Pretrial Conference is SET for 2/27/2012 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.. Trial is SET for 5/29/2012 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 MARIA CHRISTINA STEIN, aka MARY STEIN, 10 Plaintiff, 11 12 13 14 15 16 v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., successor in interest to Countrywide Bank, FSB; and MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEM, INC. aka “MERS” Defendants.1 ________________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2:10-cv-02827-GEB-EFB STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER 17 Although Plaintiff did not participate in filing a Status 18 Report as ordered, Defendants state in their Status Report that they 19 “remain amenable to the dates set forth in the Court’s April 4, 2011 20 pretrial scheduling order.” (ECF No. 35, 4:18-19.) Therefore, the status 21 (pretrial scheduling) conference scheduled for May 23, 2011, is vacated 22 and the following order issues. DISMISSAL OF DOE DEFENDANTS 23 Since Plaintiff has not justified Doe defendants remaining in 24 25 this action, Does 1-20 are dismissed. See Order Setting Status 26 (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference filed October 26, 2010, at 2 n.2 27 28 1 The caption has been amended according to the Dismissal of Doe Defendants portion of this Order. 1 1 (indicating that if justification for “Doe” defendant allegations not 2 provided Doe defendants would be dismissed). 3 SERVICE, JOINDER OF ADDITIONAL PARTIES, AMENDMENT 4 No further service, joinder of parties or amendments to 5 pleadings is permitted, except with leave of Court for good cause shown. 6 DISCOVERY 7 All discovery shall be completed by October 11, 2011. In this 8 context, “completed” means that all discovery shall have been conducted 9 so that all depositions have been taken and any disputes relative to 10 discovery shall have been resolved by appropriate orders, if necessary, 11 and, where discovery has been ordered, the order has been complied with 12 or, alternatively, the time allowed for such compliance shall have 13 expired. 14 Each party shall comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15 26(a)(2)(c)(i)’s initial expert witness disclosure requirements on or 16 before May 20, 2011, and any contradictory and/or rebuttal expert 17 disclosure authorized under Rule 26(a)(2)(c)(ii) on or before July 13, 18 2011. 19 MOTION HEARING SCHEDULE 20 21 The last hearing date for motions shall be December 21, 2011, at 9:00 a.m.2 22 Motions shall be filed in accordance with Local Rule 230(b). 23 Opposition papers shall be filed in accordance with Local Rule 230(c). 24 Failure to comply with this local rule may be deemed consent to the 25 motion and the Court may dispose of the motion summarily. Brydges v. 26 27 28 2 This time deadline does not apply to motions for continuances, temporary restraining orders, emergency applications, or motions under Rule 16(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 2 1 Lewis, 18 F.3d 651, 652-53 (9th Cir. 1994). 2 oppose a summary judgment motion may result in the granting of that 3 motion if the movant shifts the burden to the nonmovant to demonstrate 4 a genuine issue of material fact remains for trial. 5 Gates, 44 F.3d 722 (9th Cir. 1995). 6 The parties are cautioned Further, failure to timely that an Cf. Marshall v. untimely 7 characterized as a motion in limine may be summarily denied. 8 motion in limine addresses the admissibility of evidence. 9 A motion FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE 10 The final pretrial conference is set for February 27, 2012, at 11 2:30 p.m. 12 THE CASE for each party shall attend the final pretrial conference. 13 addition, all persons representing themselves and appearing in propria 14 persona must attend the pretrial conference. The parties are cautioned that the lead attorney who WILL TRY In 15 The parties are warned that non-trial worthy issues could be 16 eliminated sua sponte “[i]f the pretrial conference discloses that no 17 material facts are in dispute and that the undisputed facts entitle one 18 of the parties to judgment as a matter of law.” 19 S’holders Protective Comm., 770 F.2d 866, 869 (9th Cir. 1985). Portsmouth Square v. 20 The parties shall file a JOINT pretrial statement no later 21 than seven (7) calendar days prior to the final pretrial conference.3 22 The 23 including a description of each theory of liability and affirmative joint pretrial statement shall specify the issues for trial, 24 25 26 27 28 3 The failure of one or more of the parties to participate in the preparation of any joint document required to be filed in this case does not excuse the other parties from their obligation to timely file the document in accordance with this Order. In the event a party fails to participate as ordered, the party or parties timely submitting the document shall include a declaration explaining why they were unable to obtain the cooperation of the other party. 3 1 defense, and shall estimate the length of the trial.4 The Court uses the 2 parties’ joint pretrial statement to prepare its final pretrial order 3 and could issue the final pretrial order without holding the scheduled 4 final pretrial conference. 5 (7th Cir. 1999) (“There is no requirement that the court hold a pretrial 6 conference.”). 7 If possible, at See Mizwicki v. Helwig, 196 F.3d 828, 833 the time of filing the joint pretrial 8 statement counsel shall also email it in a format compatible with 9 WordPerfect to: geborders@caed.uscourts.gov. 10 TRIAL SETTING 11 Trial shall commence at 9:00 a.m. on May 29, 2012. 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 Dated: May 18, 2011 14 15 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 If a trial by jury has been preserved, the joint pretrial statement shall also state how much time each party desires for voir dire, opening statements, and closing arguments. 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?