Stein v. Bank of America, N.A., et al.,
Filing
37
STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr., on 5/18/11. The status (pretrial scheduling) conference set for 5/23/11 is hereby VACATED. All discovery is DUE by 10/11/11. Designation of Expert Witnesses is DUE by 5/20/1 1 and any rebuttal expert disclosure is DUE by 7/13/11. The last hearing date for motions shall be 12/21/11, at 9:00 a.m. The Final Pretrial Conference is SET for 2/27/2012 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.. Trial is SET for 5/29/2012 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.. (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
MARIA CHRISTINA STEIN, aka MARY
STEIN,
10
Plaintiff,
11
12
13
14
15
16
v.
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., successor
in interest to Countrywide Bank,
FSB; and MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC
REGISTRATION SYSTEM, INC. aka
“MERS”
Defendants.1
________________________________
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
2:10-cv-02827-GEB-EFB
STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING)
ORDER
17
Although Plaintiff did not participate in filing a Status
18
Report as ordered, Defendants state in their Status Report that they
19
“remain amenable to the dates set forth in the Court’s April 4, 2011
20
pretrial scheduling order.” (ECF No. 35, 4:18-19.) Therefore, the status
21
(pretrial scheduling) conference scheduled for May 23, 2011, is vacated
22
and the following order issues.
DISMISSAL OF DOE DEFENDANTS
23
Since Plaintiff has not justified Doe defendants remaining in
24
25
this
action,
Does
1-20
are
dismissed.
See
Order
Setting
Status
26
(Pretrial Scheduling) Conference filed October 26, 2010, at 2 n.2
27
28
1
The caption has been amended according to the Dismissal of Doe
Defendants portion of this Order.
1
1
(indicating that if justification for “Doe” defendant allegations not
2
provided Doe defendants would be dismissed).
3
SERVICE, JOINDER OF ADDITIONAL PARTIES, AMENDMENT
4
No further service, joinder of parties or amendments to
5
pleadings is permitted, except with leave of Court for good cause shown.
6
DISCOVERY
7
All discovery shall be completed by October 11, 2011. In this
8
context, “completed” means that all discovery shall have been conducted
9
so that all depositions have been taken and any disputes relative to
10
discovery shall have been resolved by appropriate orders, if necessary,
11
and, where discovery has been ordered, the order has been complied with
12
or, alternatively, the time allowed for such compliance shall have
13
expired.
14
Each party shall comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
15
26(a)(2)(c)(i)’s initial expert witness disclosure requirements on or
16
before May 20, 2011, and any contradictory and/or rebuttal expert
17
disclosure authorized under Rule 26(a)(2)(c)(ii) on or before July 13,
18
2011.
19
MOTION HEARING SCHEDULE
20
21
The last hearing date for motions shall be December 21, 2011,
at 9:00 a.m.2
22
Motions shall be filed in accordance with Local Rule 230(b).
23
Opposition papers shall be filed in accordance with Local Rule 230(c).
24
Failure to comply with this local rule may be deemed consent to the
25
motion and the Court may dispose of the motion summarily.
Brydges v.
26
27
28
2
This time deadline does not apply to motions for continuances,
temporary restraining orders, emergency applications, or motions under
Rule 16(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
2
1
Lewis, 18 F.3d 651, 652-53 (9th Cir. 1994).
2
oppose a summary judgment motion may result in the granting of that
3
motion if the movant shifts the burden to the nonmovant to demonstrate
4
a genuine issue of material fact remains for trial.
5
Gates, 44 F.3d 722 (9th Cir. 1995).
6
The
parties
are
cautioned
Further, failure to timely
that
an
Cf. Marshall v.
untimely
7
characterized as a motion in limine may be summarily denied.
8
motion
in limine addresses the admissibility of evidence.
9
A motion
FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE
10
The final pretrial conference is set for February 27, 2012, at
11
2:30 p.m.
12
THE CASE for each party shall attend the final pretrial conference.
13
addition, all persons representing themselves and appearing in propria
14
persona must attend the pretrial conference.
The parties are cautioned that the lead attorney who WILL TRY
In
15
The parties are warned that non-trial worthy issues could be
16
eliminated sua sponte “[i]f the pretrial conference discloses that no
17
material facts are in dispute and that the undisputed facts entitle one
18
of the parties to judgment as a matter of law.”
19
S’holders Protective Comm., 770 F.2d 866, 869 (9th Cir. 1985).
Portsmouth Square v.
20
The parties shall file a JOINT pretrial statement no later
21
than seven (7) calendar days prior to the final pretrial conference.3
22
The
23
including a description of each theory of liability and affirmative
joint
pretrial
statement
shall
specify
the
issues
for
trial,
24
25
26
27
28
3
The failure of one or more of the parties to participate in
the preparation of any joint document required to be filed in this case
does not excuse the other parties from their obligation to timely file
the document in accordance with this Order. In the event a party fails
to participate as ordered, the party or parties timely submitting the
document shall include a declaration explaining why they were unable to
obtain the cooperation of the other party.
3
1
defense, and shall estimate the length of the trial.4 The Court uses the
2
parties’ joint pretrial statement to prepare its final pretrial order
3
and could issue the final pretrial order without holding the scheduled
4
final pretrial conference.
5
(7th Cir. 1999) (“There is no requirement that the court hold a pretrial
6
conference.”).
7
If
possible,
at
See Mizwicki v. Helwig, 196 F.3d 828, 833
the
time
of
filing
the
joint
pretrial
8
statement counsel shall also email it in a format compatible with
9
WordPerfect to: geborders@caed.uscourts.gov.
10
TRIAL SETTING
11
Trial shall commence at 9:00 a.m. on May 29, 2012.
12
IT IS SO ORDERED.
13
Dated:
May 18, 2011
14
15
GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.
United States District Judge
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
If a trial by jury has been preserved, the joint pretrial
statement shall also state how much time each party desires for voir
dire, opening statements, and closing arguments.
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?