Center for Biological Diversity v. Crawley, et al

Filing 11

ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 10/26/10. The court is in receipt of the Notice of Related Cases concerning the above-captioned cases filed October 20, 2010. The court has determined that it is inappropriate to relate or reassign the cases, and therefore declines to do so. This order is issued for informational purposes only, and shall have no effect on the status of the cases, including any previous Related (or Non-Related) Case Order of this court.(Williams, D)

Download PDF
Center for Biological Diversity v. Crawley, et al Doc. 11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiffs, 19 v. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 //// //// //// 1 Dockets.Justia.com IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA PUBLIC LANDS FOR THE PEOPLE, et al., on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, et al., / CENTER FOR SIERRA NEVADA CONSERVATION, et al., CIV. NO. S-09-1750 LKK/JFM CIV. S-09-2523 LKK/JFM UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, et al., Defendants. / 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, a non-profit corporation, Plaintiff, v. MIKE CRAWLEY, in his official capacity as District Ranger for the Bridgeport Ranger District, and UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, an agency of the Department of Agriculture, Defendants. / The court is in receipt of the Notice of Related Cases concerning the above-captioned cases filed October 20, 2010. After consideration, the court has determined that it is Civ. S-10-2830 WBS/JFM NON-RELATED CASE ORDER 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 inappropriate to relate or reassign the cases, and therefore declines to do so. This order is issued for informational purposes only, and shall have no effect on the status of the cases, including any previous Related (or Non-Related) Case Order of this court. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: October 26, 2010. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?