Anderson v. Benedict
Filing
81
ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 12/30/14 ORDERING that the motion for reconsideration 79 is DENIED. (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
BRYON ANDERSON,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:10-cv-2833 KJM GGH
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
MCM CONSTRUCTION, INC.,
Defendant.
16
17
On December 12, 2014, plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration of the denial of
18
an earlier motion for reconsideration. Although the court had denied plaintiff’s request for
19
additional time in which to file this motion, plaintiff had filed the motion before the denial issued.
20
21
22
As noted in the order denying plaintiff’s request for an extension of time, the
request for reconsideration is not timely. Order, ECF No. 80. Moreover, in the request for
additional time, plaintiff represented he had asked the Labor and Workforce Development
23
24
25
Agency to review his hours and would thus be able to submit proof of discrimination based on
various discrepancies in the time records. Mot., ECF No. 78. Plaintiff does not supply any such
26
analysis with the current motion, but rather attaches only a portion of an earlier order from the
27
magistrate judge; some correspondence from his former employer, MCM Construction, to the
28
1
1
Equal Opportunity Commission, dated 2009; and some union records from 2006. However, a
2
motion for reconsideration “‘may not be used to relitigate old matters, or to raise arguments or
3
present evidence that could have been raised prior to the entry of judgment.’” Mazalin v. Safeway,
4
Inc., No. CIV S–10–1445 KJM CMK, 2012 WL 5387704, at *1 (E.D.Cal. Nov. 1, 2012) (quoting
5
6
7
Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker, 554 U.S. 471, 485 n.5 (2008)). The material plaintiff has presented
in support of the current motion could have been offered earlier.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration, ECF No. 79,
8
9
10
is denied.
DATED: December 30, 2014.
11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?