Anderson v. Benedict

Filing 81

ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 12/30/14 ORDERING that the motion for reconsideration 79 is DENIED. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BRYON ANDERSON, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:10-cv-2833 KJM GGH Plaintiff, v. ORDER MCM CONSTRUCTION, INC., Defendant. 16 17 On December 12, 2014, plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration of the denial of 18 an earlier motion for reconsideration. Although the court had denied plaintiff’s request for 19 additional time in which to file this motion, plaintiff had filed the motion before the denial issued. 20 21 22 As noted in the order denying plaintiff’s request for an extension of time, the request for reconsideration is not timely. Order, ECF No. 80. Moreover, in the request for additional time, plaintiff represented he had asked the Labor and Workforce Development 23 24 25 Agency to review his hours and would thus be able to submit proof of discrimination based on various discrepancies in the time records. Mot., ECF No. 78. Plaintiff does not supply any such 26 analysis with the current motion, but rather attaches only a portion of an earlier order from the 27 magistrate judge; some correspondence from his former employer, MCM Construction, to the 28 1 1 Equal Opportunity Commission, dated 2009; and some union records from 2006. However, a 2 motion for reconsideration “‘may not be used to relitigate old matters, or to raise arguments or 3 present evidence that could have been raised prior to the entry of judgment.’” Mazalin v. Safeway, 4 Inc., No. CIV S–10–1445 KJM CMK, 2012 WL 5387704, at *1 (E.D.Cal. Nov. 1, 2012) (quoting 5 6 7 Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker, 554 U.S. 471, 485 n.5 (2008)). The material plaintiff has presented in support of the current motion could have been offered earlier. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration, ECF No. 79, 8 9 10 is denied. DATED: December 30, 2014. 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?