Navarro v. Countrywide Home Loans Inc., et al

Filing 9

ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 3/3/11 ORDERING 8 Findings and Recommendations are adopted in full; This action is REMANDED to Sacramento Superior Court. Copy of remand order sent to other court. CASE CLOSED.(Matson, R)

Download PDF
(PS) Navarro v. Countrywide Home Loans Inc., et al Doc. 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 On December 23, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed. Accordingly, the court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orland v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1999). The magistrate judge's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified Sch. Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the proposed Findings and Recommendations in full. 1 Dockets.Justia.com IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SANTIAGO L. NAVARRO, Plaintiff, vs. COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC.; BANK OF AMERICA HOME LOANS; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC.; and DOES 1 through 50, Defendants. __________________________________/ ORDER No. CIV S-10-2848 JAM EFB PS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ADOPTED; Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. The proposed Findings and Recommendations filed December 23, 2010, are 2. This action is remanded to the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of Sacramento. DATED: March 3, 2011 /s/ John A. Mendez UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?