Galzinski v. City of Sacramento et al

Filing 38

ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 1/5/12; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: The findings and recommendations filed October 17, 2011, are adopted in full; Defendant Wimple's motion to dismiss (Docket No. 29) is granted; and Defendant Wimple is dismissed from this action. (Matson, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

HARALD MARK GALZINSKI,
Plaintiff,

11
12
13
14

vs.
CITY OF SACRAMENTO, et al.,
Defendants.

ORDER
/

15
16

No. CIV S-10-2860 KJM CKD P

Plaintiff, a California prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

17

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

18

Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

19

On October 17, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations,

20

which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to

21

the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Plaintiff has filed

22

objections to the findings and recommendations.

23

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule

24

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the file,

25

the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the

26

proper analysis.
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed October 17, 2011, are adopted in full;

3

2. Defendant Wimple’s motion to dismiss (Docket No. 29) is granted; and

4

3. Defendant Wimple is dismissed from this action.

5

DATED: January 5, 2012.

6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
galz2860.805

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2