Merrida v. Aramark Food Service Provider, et al
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 10/29/2010 ORDERING pltf to submit, w/in 30 days, a complete ifp application or the appropriate filing fee; and the clerk to send pltf a new ifp form.(Yin, K)
(PC) Merrida v. Aramark Food Service Provider, et al
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Defendants. 16 / 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has not, however, filed a complete application to proceed in forma pauperis or paid the required filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a), 1915(a), (a)(2). Specifically, while plaintiff has provided a certified copy of his trust account statement, he has not provided a complete in forma pauperis application. The application filed by plaintiff is missing the first page. Plaintiff will be provided the opportunity to submit either a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee. Plaintiff is warned that failure to resolve the fee status of this case within the time provided may result in the dismissal of this action for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders. See Local Rule 110. 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DENNIS MERRIDA, Plaintiff, vs. ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE PROVIDER, et al.,
No. CIV S-10-2865-CMK-P
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff shall submit on the form provided by the Clerk of the Court,
within 30 days from the date of this order, a complete application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee; and 2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new form Application
to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner.
DATED: October 29, 2010 ______________________________________ CRAIG M. KELLISON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?