Merrida v. Aramark Food Service Provider, et al

Filing 8

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 11/10/2010 GRANTING 6 Motion to Proceed IFP. No initial partial filing fee will be assessed. Monthly payments to be forwarded to the Clerk of Court. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
(PC) Merrida v. Aramark Food Service Provider, et al Doc. 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Defendants. 16 / 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 granted; /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DENNIS MERRIDA, Plaintiff, vs. ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE PROVIDER, et al., No. CIV S-10-2865-LKK-CMK-P ORDER Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff's request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 6). Plaintiff's complaint will be addressed separately. Plaintiff has submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). The request to proceed in forma pauperis will, therefore, be granted. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 6) is 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2. Plaintiff is required to pay the full statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1914(a) and 1915(b)(1); 3. 1915(b)(1); and 4. Plaintiff will be obligated for monthly payments of twenty percent of the No initial partial filing fee will be assessed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. preceding month's income credited to plaintiff's inmate trust account, such payments to be forwarded by the appropriate agency to the Clerk of the Court each time the amount in plaintiff's account exceeds $10.00, until the statutory filing fee is paid in full, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2). DATED: November 10, 2010 ______________________________________ CRAIG M. KELLISON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?