Bashaw et al v. The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation et al
Filing
18
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/8/11. Plaintiffs are hereby ORDERED, within 14 days of the entry of this order, to SHOW CAUSE why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
KATHLEEN BASHAW, et al.,
11
Plaintiffs,
No. CIV S-10-2869 KJM-DAD
12
vs.
13
14
15
THE BANK OF NEW YORK
MELLON CORPORATION, et al.,
Defendants.
/
16
17
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
On July 18, 2011, the court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss and allowed
18
plaintiffs twenty-one (21) days to file an amended complaint plaintiff. (ECF 17.) More than two
19
months have passed and plaintiffs have not filed an amended complaint. Plaintiffs are hereby
20
ORDERED, within fourteen (14) days of the entry of this order, to show cause why this case
21
should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. See Chambers v. NASCO, Inc., 501 U.S. 32, 49
22
(1991) (“[A] federal district court has the inherent power to dismiss a case sua sponte for failure
23
to prosecute . . . .”); FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b).
24
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: September 28, 2011.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
26
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?