Seeboth v. Mayberg et al
Filing
14
ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 8/29/11 ORDERING that the FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS filed 6/23/11 13 are ADOPTED in full; Respondents' MOTION TO DISMISS 9 is GRANTED. All Claims relating to the time priod 2001 through 200 7 are DISMISSED as second or successive, but such dismissal is without prejudice to pursuing those claims if leave from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals is obtained. This Action shall proceed on Petitioner's claims relating to the time period 2007 through 2010; Respondents shall file an answer to the petition within 30 days of the date of this order. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
TIMOTHY JOSEPH SEEBOTH,
12
Petitioner,
13
14
No. 2:10-CV-02875-MCE-CMK-P
vs.
ORDER
STEPHEN MAYBERG, et al.,
15
Respondents.
16
/
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se,1 brings this petition for a writ of
17
18
habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 challenging a civil commitment order. The matter
19
was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern District of California local
20
rules.
21
On June 23, 2011, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations
22
herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file
23
objections within a specified time. No objections to the findings and recommendations have
24
been filed.
25
26
1
Petitioner is confined as a sexually violent predator.
1
1
2
The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
supported by the record and by the Magistrate Judge's analysis.
3
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
4
1.
5
The findings and recommendations filed June 23, 2011 (ECF No. 13), are
ADOPTED in full;
6
2.
Respondents’ motion to dismiss (ECF No. 9) is GRANTED;
7
3.
All claims relating to the time period 2001 through 2007 are dismissed as
8
second or successive, but such dismissal is without prejudice to pursuing those claims if leave
9
from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals is obtained;
10
11
4.
2007 through 2010; and
12
13
14
This action shall proceed on petitioner’s claims relating to the time period
5.
Respondents shall file an answer to the petition within 30 days of the date
of this order.
Dated: August 29, 2011
15
16
17
________________________________
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?