Jimenez v. Horel

Filing 38

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/26/2011 GRANTING 35 Defendants motion for order; defendants are permitted to take plaintiffs deposition via video conference. (cc: Warden-PBSP) (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT CHRISTOPHER JIMENEZ, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 No. 2:10-cv-2943 KJN P vs. J. WHITFIELD, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 ORDER / 16 On August 18, 2011, defendants filed a motion for an order to conduct plaintiff’s 17 deposition via video conference. Good cause appearing, defendants’ request to conduct the 18 deposition of plaintiff via video conference is granted. Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(4). 19 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants’ August 18, 2011 motion (dkt. no. 20 35) is granted. Defendants are permitted to take plaintiff’s deposition via video conference. 21 DATED: August 26, 2011 22 23 _____________________________________ KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 24 25 26 jime2943.vid

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?