Jimenez v. Horel

Filing 70

ORDER AND RAND NOTICE signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/23/2012 INFORMING plaintiff of the requirements, as stated in this order and notice, for opposing a motion for summary judgment; within 30 days, plaintiff shall file an opposition, if any, to the 60 motion for summary judgment, defendants' reply, if any, shall be filed within 7 days thereafter. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT CHRISTOPHER JIMENEZ, 11 Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 No. 2:10-cv-2943 KJN P J. WHITFIELD, 14 15 16 Defendant. ORDER / On June 11, 2012, defendant Whitfield filed a motion for summary judgment. 17 The motion did not include the notice required by Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 957 (9th Cir. 18 1998) (en banc), and Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409 (9th Cir. 1988). Plaintiff did not 19 timely file an opposition to the motion. 20 However, on July 6, 2012, the Ninth Circuit issued an order requiring that all 21 prisoners proceeding pro se must be provided contemporaneous notice of certain requirements 22 for opposing a motion for summary judgment. Woods v. Carey, 2012 WL 2626912,*1 (9th Cir. 23 July 06, 2012 ), citing Rand and Klingele. The district court may provide such notice if 24 defendants fail to do so. Woods, 2012 WL 2626912 at *5. When provided by defendant, the 25 notification must be set forth in “a separate document, served with the moving papers, and state[] 26 that the court has required that it be given.” Rand, 154 F.3d at 960; Woods, 2012 WL 2626912 1 1 at *4. These requirements apply to both “pending and future cases.” Woods at *6. Accordingly, 2 the court will provide plaintiff with the notice required under Woods, and will grant plaintiff an 3 extension of time to file an opposition. 4 However, plaintiff failed to timely file any opposition to the June 11, 2012 5 motion. Pursuant to Local Rule 230(l), oppositions are due twenty-one days after the filing of the 6 motion. Local Rule 230(l) provides in part: “Failure of the responding party to file written 7 opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to 8 the granting of the motion . . . .” On January 12, 2011, plaintiff was advised of the requirements 9 for filing an opposition to a motion and that failure to oppose such a motion may be deemed a 10 waiver of opposition to the motion. See Rand, 154 F.3d at 957, and Klingele, 849 F.2d at 411- 11 12. 12 Local Rule 110 provides that failure to comply with the Local Rules “may be 13 grounds for imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the 14 inherent power of the Court.” In the order filed January 12, 2011, plaintiff was also advised that 15 failure to comply with the Local Rules may result in a recommendation that the action be 16 dismissed. 17 Finally, Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides: 18 Involuntary Dismissal; Effect. If the plaintiff fails to prosecute or to comply with these rules or a court order, a defendant may move to dismiss the action or any claim against it. Unless the dismissal order states otherwise, a dismissal under this subdivision (b) and any dismissal not under this rule--except one for lack of jurisdiction, improper venue, or failure to join a party under Rule 19--operates as an adjudication on the merits. 19 20 21 22 Id. 23 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 24 1. Plaintiff is hereby informed of the following requirements for opposing a 25 motion for summary judgment: 26 //// 2 1 Rand Notice1 2 Plaintiff is informed that the following requirements apply for opposing a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56. Such a motion is a request for an order for judgment in favor of the defendant without trial. A defendant’s motion for summary judgment will set forth the facts that the defendant contends are not reasonably subject to dispute and that entitle the defendant to judgment. 3 4 5 6 To oppose a motion for summary judgment, plaintiff must show proof of his or her claims. Plaintiff may do this in one or more of the following ways. Plaintiff may rely on plaintiff’s statements made under penalty of perjury in the complaint if the complaint shows that plaintiff has personal knowledge of the matters stated and plaintiff specifies those parts of the complaint on which plaintiff relies. Unsigned affidavits or declarations will be stricken, and affidavits or declarations not signed under penalty of perjury have no evidentiary value. Plaintiff may serve and file one or more affidavits or declarations setting forth the facts that plaintiff believes prove plaintiff’s claims; the person who signs an affidavit or declaration must have personal knowledge of the facts stated. Plaintiff may rely on written records, but plaintiff must prove that the records are what plaintiff asserts they are. Plaintiff may rely on all or any part of the transcript of one or more depositions, answers to interrogatories, or admissions obtained in this proceeding. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 If plaintiff fails to contradict the defendant’s evidence with counteraffidavits or other admissible evidence, the court may accept defendant’s evidence as true and grant the motion. If there is some good reason why such facts are not available to plaintiff when required to oppose a motion for summary judgment, the court will consider a request to postpone consideration of the defendant’s motion. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(d). 16 17 18 19 If plaintiff does not serve and file a written opposition to the motion, or a request to postpone consideration of the motion, the court may consider the failure to act as a waiver of opposition to the defendant’s motion. See L.R. 230(l). 20 21 If the court grants the motion for summary judgment, whether opposed or unopposed, judgment will be entered for the defendant without a trial and the case will be closed as to that defendant. In the present case, summary judgment for defendant would end the entire case. 22 23 24 25 26 1 This notice is provided to ensure that you, a pro se prisoner plaintiff, “have fair, timely and adequate notice of what is required” to oppose a motion for summary judgment. See Woods 2012 WL 2626912 at *1; Rand, 154 F.3d at 957, and Klingele, 849 F.2d at 409. 3 1 2. Within thirty days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition, 2 if any, to the motion for summary judgment. Failure to file an opposition will be deemed as 3 consent to have the: (a) pending motion granted; (b) action dismissed for lack of prosecution; 4 and (c) action dismissed based on plaintiff’s failure to comply with these rules and a court order. 5 Said failure shall result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed pursuant to Federal 6 Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Defendants’ reply, if any, shall be filed within seven days 7 thereafter. 8 DATED: July 23, 2012 9 10 _____________________________________ KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 12 jime2943.ntc 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?