Cordoba v. California Medical Facility et al

Filing 28

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/28/2011 GRANTING 27 Defendants' motion for leave to conduct plaintiff's deposition via videoconference; and nothing in this order shall be interpreted as requiring any state penal institution to obtain video-conferencing equipment if it is not already available. (Reader, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

WILLIAM CORDOBA,

11

Plaintiff,

12
13

No. CIV S-10-2944 DAD P

vs.
KATHLEEN L. DICKINSON, et al.,

14

Defendants.

15

ORDER
/

16

Defendants Viera and Rivers have filed a motion for leave to take plaintiff’s

17

deposition via video-conference. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(4), the court

18

will grant defendants’ motion. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

19
20

1. Defendants’ motion for leave to conduct plaintiff’s deposition via videoconference (Doc. No. 27) is granted; and

21

2. Nothing in this order shall be interpreted as requiring any state penal institution

22

to obtain video-conferencing equipment if it is not already available.

23

DATED: September 28, 2011.

24
25

DAD:9
cord2944.depo

26
1