Osotonu v. Ringler, et al
Filing
16
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/12/2012 GRANTING plaintiff's 15 motion to amend; and plaintiff shall file a second amended complaint within 30 days. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
OSTON G. OSOTONU,
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
vs.
C/O RINGLER, et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
ORDER
/
16
17
No. CIV S-10-2964 MCE DAD P
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. Plaintiff seeks relief pursuant to 42
U.S.C. § 1983.
18
The court previously dismissed plaintiff’s complaint and granted him leave to file
19
an amended complaint. After granting him several extensions of time, plaintiff complied with
20
the court’s order and filed amended complaint. However, before the court had an opportunity to
21
screen plaintiff’s amended complaint he filed a motion to amend, asking the court for permission
22
to file a second amended complaint to correct certain deficiencies in his amended complaint.
23
Under the circumstances of this case, the court will grant plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend
24
and direct him to file a second amended complaint within thirty days. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15
25
(“The court should freely give leave [to amend] when justice so requires.”).
26
/////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. Plaintiff’s motion to amend (Doc. No. 15) is granted;
3
2. Plaintiff shall file a second amended complaint within thirty days of the date of
4
service of this order. Failure to comply with the court’s order or seek an extension of time to do
5
so will result in a recommendation for dismissal of this action.
6
DATED: March 12, 2012.
7
8
9
DAD:9
osot2964.mta
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?