Bridgewater v. Cate, et al
Filing
54
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 9/10/13 ORDERING that the FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS filed 5/31/13 47 are ADOPTED in full; Plaintiff's MOTION for further judicial intervention in connection with his attempts to locate defendant Hazlewood 41 is DENIED; and Defendant Hazlewood is DISMISSED without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) and 41(b).(Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
KEITH BRIDGEWATER,
11
12
Plaintiff,
No. 2:10-cv-2971 GEB DAD P
vs.
13
MATTHEW CATE, et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
16
ORDER
/
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action
17
seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate
18
Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
19
On May 31, 2013, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
20
which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to
21
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed
22
objections to the findings and recommendations.
23
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule
24
304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire
25
file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by
26
proper analysis.
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed May 31, 2013, are adopted in full;
3
2. Plaintiff’s motion for further judicial intervention in connection with his
4
attempts to locate defendant Hazlewood (Doc. No. 41) is denied; and
5
3. Defendant Hazlewood is dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P.
6
4(m) and 41(b).
7
DATED: September 10, 2013
8
9
10
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
11
12
13
/brid2971.805
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?