Hughes v. Walker

Filing 78

ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 2/20/15 re: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the 74 Order is AFFIRMED. (Meuleman, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 DEANGELEO ANTOINE HUGHES, 10 Petitioner, 11 12 No. 2:10-cv-03024-WBS-GGH v. ORDER JAMES WALKER, 13 Respondent. 14 On January 29, 2015, petitioner filed “objections” which this court construes as a request 15 16 for reconsideration of the magistrate judge’s order filed December 17, 2014, denying an 17 evidentiary hearing. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be 18 upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Id. Upon review of the entire file, the court 19 finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to 20 law. 21 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the 22 magistrate judge filed December 17, 2014, is affirmed. 23 Dated: February 20, 2015 24 25 26 27 Hugh3024.850 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?