Hughes v. Walker

Filing 78

ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 2/20/15 re: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the 74 Order is AFFIRMED. (Meuleman, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9

DEANGELEO ANTOINE HUGHES,

10

Petitioner,

11
12

No. 2:10-cv-03024-WBS-GGH

v.

ORDER

JAMES WALKER,

13

Respondent.

14
On January 29, 2015, petitioner filed “objections” which this court construes as a request

15
16

for reconsideration of the magistrate judge’s order filed December 17, 2014, denying an

17

evidentiary hearing. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be

18

upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Id. Upon review of the entire file, the court

19

finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to

20

law.

21

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the

22

magistrate judge filed December 17, 2014, is affirmed.

23

Dated: February 20, 2015

24
25
26
27

Hugh3024.850

28
1