Johnson v. Ralda et al

Filing 19

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 7/14/2011. Within 14 days of date of this Order, Mr. Johnson shall SHOW CAUSE in writing why he should not be sanctioned for his representation that his recuperation from surgery required lengthy continuances he secured in other cases. He shall file a copy of his Response in this case and in others referenced in body of this Order. Clerk directed to file copy of Order in other cases referenced in body of text. (Marciel, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SCOTT N. JOHNSON, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-11-106 KJM GGH TOWN AND COUNTRY GARDEN APARTMENTS, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 11 vs. 12 13 14 Defendant. / 15 This case was on calendar on June 22, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. for a pretrial scheduling 16 conference. The case was the first on calendar; neither counsel appeared. The evening before 17 the hearing Mr. Johnson’s assistant told the courtroom deputy that the case had settled; the 18 courtroom deputy told Mr. Johnson’s assistant that the case would remain on calendar until a 19 notice was filed confirming settlement. The courtroom deputy spoke to Mr. Johnson on the 20 morning of June 22 and reiterated that the case remained on calendar because neither counsel 21 had filed a notice of settlement. The notice was filed at 10:13 a.m. 22 In addition, in the following cases also assigned to this judge, Mr. Johnson asked 23 for and received three month continuances because of surgery scheduled for June 15: Johnson v. 24 Lack Family Investments, Civ. No. S-11-0003 (ECF No. 15 at 1 n.1); Johnson v. Lack Family 25 Investments, Civ. No. S-11-0897 (ECF No. 11 at 1 n.1); Johnson v. Ducray, Civ. No. S-10-3095 26 1 1 (ECF No. 17 at 1 n.1); Johnson v. Felipe Lopez Ralda, et al., Civ. No. S-10-3029 (ECF No. 18 at 2 1 n.1). In granting those continuances, the court relied on “Mr. Johnson’s representation that a 3 lengthy continuance is necessary because he will be unable to appear during his recuperation.” 4 Despite this representation in the other cases, Mr. Johnson continues to act in this case at least, 5 despite his surgery, and has not sought a continuance of this case. 6 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 7 1. Within fourteen days of the date of this order, both counsel in this case shall 8 show cause in writing why they should not be sanctioned $250.00 each for not timely filing their 9 notice of settlement and, because the notice of settlement had not been filed, for not appearing at 10 the pretrial scheduling conference; 11 2. Within fourteen days of the date of this order, Mr. Johnson shall show cause in 12 writing why he should not be sanctioned for his representation that his recuperation from surgery 13 required the lengthy continuances he secured in other cases, and file a copy of his response in 14 this case and in the others referenced above in the body of this order; and 15 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to file a copy of this order in the cases 16 referenced above in the body of this order. 17 DATED: July 14, 2011. 18 19 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?