Hairston v. Harrington

Filing 27

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/19/11 ORDERING that petitioners motion for law library access 24 and motion for extension of time 25 are DENIED as unnecessary. (Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

ANTHONY JEROME HAIRSTON,

11
12
13

Petitioner,

No. 2:10-cv-3056 JAM KJN P

vs.
K. HARRINGTON,

14

Respondent.

15

ORDER
/

16

On June 24, 2011, petitioner filed a motion requesting that the court order prison

17

officials to grant him law library access so that he may prepare his reply to respondent’s answer.

18

On July 11, 2011, petitioner filed a motion for an extension of time to file his reply. On July 14,

19

2011, petitioner filed his reply. Accordingly, petitioner’s motion for law library access and

20

motion for extension of time are denied as unnecessary.

21

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner’s motion for law library

22

access (Dkt. No. 24) and motion for extension of time (Dkt. No. 25) are denied as unnecessary.

23

DATED: July 19, 2011

24
_____________________________________
KENDALL J. NEWMAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

25
26

hair3056.111(2)