United States of America v. Tingler et al

Filing 25

AMENDED ORDER OF EXPUNGEMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 3/30/12. The hearing date of May 7, 2012 is VACATED. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Sacramento Division 6 7 8 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, 9 vs. 10 11 Civ. No. 2:10-CV-03061-WBS-KJN CHARLES JOHN TINGLER, VICTORIA MARIE TINGLER 12 AMENDED ORDER OF EXPUNGEMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION Defendants. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The United States Motion for Amended Order (Rec. Doc. 24), the motion is GRANTED. This Order supercedes the order of expungement previously issued by the Court on May 6, 2011 (Rec. Doc. 22). For the reasons set forth in the Order (Doc. No. 21) granting the United States’ Motion for Default Judgment, the Court hereby finds as follows: (1) Defendants have failed to plead or otherwise defend this case. The Court deems them to have admitted the allegations in the United States’ Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 4). (2) Facts presented in the Declaration of Dean Prodromos clearly show that defendants Charles and Victoria Tingler (“the Tinglers”) have filed UCC Financing statements against an officer of the United States with the Secretary of State for the State of California. (3) Facts presented in the Declaration of Dean Prodromos demonstrate that he, as an officer of the United States, has no relationship with the Tinglers that would give rise to a legitimate notice of lien. It therefore clearly appears that the lien is frivolous. Furthermore, it clearly appears that the lien was filed solely to retaliate against her for her good-faith efforts to enforce the tax laws against the Tinglers. (4) Plaintiff has demonstrated that the entry of this injunction is necessary and -1- 1 2 appropriate to the enforcement of the internal revenue laws. 26 U.S.C. § 7402(a). (5) In addition, Plaintiff has demonstrated that continued filings of frivolous liens 3 against its officers would cause it irreparable harm, because federal officers who face personal 4 reprisal through encumbrance of their property and damage to their credit record may be unable 5 to enforce the internal revenue laws vigorously and evenhandedly. 6 (6) Furthermore, Plaintiff has demonstrated that it has no adequate remedy at law 7 with respect to future frivolous lien filings, because it would suffer the irreparable harm 8 described above during the time in which it would be required to apply to a court to have the lien 9 filings stricken. 10 (7) The equities weigh in favor of Plaintiff because Defendants have no basis for 11 filing nonconsensual liens against federal officers. Furthermore, an injunction is in the public 12 interest because it will help ensure that federal officers can apply the internal revenue laws free 13 of retaliation and harassment by Defendants. 14 WHEREFORE, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED as follows: 15 (1) It is hereby ORDERED that Charles Tingler and Victoria Tingler, as well as any 16 person acting on their behalf, shall be, and hereby is, PERMANENTLY ENJOINED from filing 17 any notices of lien, recording any documents, or otherwise taking any action in the public records 18 which purports to name a federal officer as a debtor, appoint a federal officer as a trustee, or 19 encumber the rights or the property of any federal officer. The injunction in this paragraph shall 20 not apply if Charles Tingler or Victoria Tingler shall first have prior permission to record the 21 document from a United States District Court, which permission shall also be recorded. 22 (2) For the purposes of the preceding paragraph, “federal officer” shall mean any 23 officer, employee, or agent of the United States or any of the agencies of the United States, or any 24 judge, magistrate judge, judicial officer, or judicial employee of the United States, regardless of 25 whether the officer, employee, or agent is named personally, in his or her official capacity, or in 26 any other capacity. 27 (3) 28 The Defendants, Charles Tingler and Victoria Tingler, are cautioned and advised that any violation of this injunction imposed by this Judgment may result in the imposition of appropriate civil or criminal sanctions as well as constituting contempt of court. -2- 1 (4) It is hereby ORDERED that the UCC Financing Statements Filing Numbers 2 10-7220769408 and 10-7220770319 as well as associated “maritime lien” notices, filed by the 3 Defendant Victoria Tingler with the Secretary of State for the State of California on January 25, 4 2010, are declared NULL, VOID, and of NO LEGAL EFFECT and shall be stricken and 5 permanently EXPUNGED from the records of the Secretary of State for the State of California. 6 (5) It is hereby ORDERED that the UCC Financing Statements Filing Numbers 09- 7 7195629432, 09-72155185, 10-7220758113 and 10-7220759629 and associated “maritime lien” 8 notices, filed by the Defendant Charles Tingler with the Secretary of State for the State of 9 California on May 6, 2009, November 30, 2009, January 25, 2010 and January 25, 2010, 10 respectively, are declared NULL, VOID, and of NO LEGAL EFFECT and shall be stricken and 11 permanently EXPUNGED from the records of the Secretary of State for the State of California. 12 13 (6) The United States may record this Judgment in the public records as necessary in order to effectuate paragraphs (1) through (5) of this Judgment. 14 15 IT IS SO ORDERED. The hearing date of May 7, 2012 is vacated. 16 17 DATED: April 2, 2012 18 19 20 21 22 Presented on March 30, 2012 by: 23 /s/ Aaron M. Bailey AARON M. BAILEY U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 683 Ben Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044 Telephone: (202) 616-3164 Fax: (202) 307-0054 E-mail: aaron.m.bailey@usdoj.gov 24 25 26 27 28 Of Counsel BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?