Bel Montez, et al., v. City of Stockton et al

Filing 31

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/16/2016 GRANTING 25 , 26 , 27 Motions to Compel; ORDERING plaintiffs Isabel Bel Montez, minor I.G., and minor J.G. to provide responses to the defendants' Interrogatories and Requests for Production of Documents by 3/1/2016. (Michel, G.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ISABEL BEL MONTEZ, et al.,

12

Plaintiffs,

13
14
15

No. 2:10-cv-3149-MCE-EFB

v.

ORDER

CITY OF STOCKTON, a municipal
corporation, et al.,
Defendants.

16
17

This case was before the court on February 10, 2016, for hearing on defendants’ motions

18
19

to compel plaintiffs Isabel Bel Montez, minor I.G., and minor J.G. to provide responses to

20

defendants’ Interrogatories and Requests for Production of Documents. ECF Nos. 25, 26, 27.

21

Attorney James Cook appeared on behalf of plaintiffs; Deputy City Attorney Ted Wood appeared

22

on behalf of defendants.
For the reasons stated on the record, defendants’ motions to compel (ECF Nos. 25, 26, 27)

23
24

are granted. Plaintiffs Isabel Bel Montez, minor I.G., and minor J.G. shall provide responses to

25

defendants’ Interrogatories and Requests for Production of Documents by March 1, 2016. Should

26

plaintiffs require additional time to provide responses, the parties may submit a stipulation

27

requesting the court to extend the deadline for compliance with this order. However, any such

28

/////
1

1

stipulation to modify the court’s scheduling order must be presented to the assigned district judge

2

and shall be supported by a showing of good cause. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4).

3

DATED: February 16, 2016.

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2