Bel Montez, et al., v. City of Stockton et al

Filing 39

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 5/12/2016 ORDERING the deadline for the completion of Discovery now due by 7/18/2016; all other dates and deadlines set forth in the Courts the Court's Second Amended Pretrial Scheduling Order 23 , and as amended by the stipulation and Order for Continuance of Pretrial Scheduling Order Deadlines 35 remain in full force and effect. (Reader, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

JOHN M. LUEBBERKE, City Attorney
State Bar No. 164893
TED DANIEL WOOD, Deputy City Attorney
State Bar No. 191768
425 N. El Dorado Street, 2nd Floor
Stockton, CA 95202
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendants
CITY OF STOCKTON, BlAIR ULRING, MARK MARQUEZ,
and TIMOTHY MCDERMOTT, municipal employees

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14
15
16

ISABEL BEL MONTEZ; ISABEL BEL
MONTEZ, Guardian Ad Litem for I.G.
and J.G. minors; JOSEPH GARCIA SR.;
ESTATE OF JOSEPH GARCIA,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
CITY OF STOCKTON, a municipal
corporation; et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 2:10-cv-03149-MCE-EFB
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR
CONTINUANCE OF PRETRAIL
SCHEDULING ORDER DEADLINE
Assigned to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.
Dept.
Complaint Filed: 11/22/2010

17

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the Plaintiffs, through their attorneys of

18

record, James Cook and Ben Nisenbaum, Law Offices of John Burris; and Defendants, City of

19

Stockton, et al., by and through attorneys of record, Ted Wood, Office of the City Attorney, that

20

the following deadlines be continued:

21

Discovery Completion:

22

All other dates remain as set forth in the Court’s Second Amended Pretrial Scheduling

23

Order (Document 23), and as amended by the Stipulation and Order for Continuance of Pretrial

24

Scheduling Order Deadlines (Document 35).

July 18, 2016 (Prior date was June 1, 2016)

25

The brief continuance is requested to permit Plaintiffs and defendants to address

26

outstanding discovery issues brought about the difficulty in client contact among Plaintiffs and

27

their counsel. The parties respectfully request the Court grant this stipulation to allow them

28

adequate time to prepare the case for trial.
1

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE OF PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER DEADLINE

1
2

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.
Dated: 5/9/16

3

By: /s/ James Cook
JAMES COOK
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Isabel Bel Montez, et al.

4
5
6
7

LAW OFFICE OF JOHN L. BURRIS

Dated: 5/9/16

8

JOHN M. LUEBBERKE
CITY ATTORNEY
By: /s/ Ted Daniel Wood
TED DANIEL WOOD
Attorneys for Defendants
City of Stockton, Stockton of Stockton Police
Department, and Blair Ulring, Chief of Police

9
10
11
12
13

ORDER

14

In accordance with the parties’ stipulation, and good cause appearing, the deadline for the

15

completion of discovery specified above is continued with the foregoing request. All other dates

16

and deadlines set forth in the Court’s the Court’s Second Amended Pretrial Scheduling Order

17

(Document 23), and as amended by the Stipulation and Order for Continuance of Pretrial

18

Scheduling Order Deadlines (Document 35) remain in full force and effect.

19
20

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 12, 2016

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE OF PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER DEADLINE