Graves v. Clinton et al

Filing 62

MINUTE ORDER by Courtroom Deputy M. Caspar for Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/9/2011: The court construes plaintiff's response to defendant's request for summary judgment or dismissal 60 as all or part of an opposition to defendant's pending motion to dismiss and for summary judgment 59 . To the extent plaintiff is seeking any affirmative relief, which is entirely unclear, he must file a properly noticed motion. See L.R. 230. (Caspar, M)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
BEFORE THE HONORABLE KENDALL J. NEWMAN

PETER GRAVES,

No. 2:10-cv-03156 MCE KJN PS

Plaintiff,
v.

MINUTE ORDER

HILLARY RANDOM CLINTON, ET AL,
Defendant.
______________________________/
The court is in receipt of plaintiff's "Response to
Defendant's Request for Summary Judgment or Dismissal" (Dkt. No.
60).

The court construes this document as all or part of an

opposition to defendant's pending motion to dismiss and for
summary judgment (Dkt. No. 59).

To the extent plaintiff is

seeking any affirmative relief, which is entirely unclear, he
must file a properly noticed motion.

Dated: August 9, 2011

See L.R. 230.

/s/ Matt Caspar
Matt Caspar,
Courtroom Deputy for the
Honorable Kendall J. Newman