Ramirez v. Martel

Filing 16

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 4/7/11 ORDERING that within 30 days of the date of this order, petitioner shall file an opposition, if any he has, to the motion to dismiss or a statement of non-opposition.(Dillon, M)

-JFM (HC) Ramirez v. Martel

Doc. 16

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. M. MARTEL, Respondent. / Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On March 7, 2011, respondent filed a motion to dismiss this action. Petitioner has not opposed the motion. Local Rule 230(l) provides in part: "Failure of the responding party to file written opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion . . . ." Local Rule 110 provides that failure to comply with the Local Rules "may be grounds for imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the inherent power of the Court." Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within thirty days of the date of this order, petitioner shall file an opposition, if any he has, to the motion to dismiss or a ///// 1
Dockets.Justia.com

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RICARDO GIL RAMIREZ, Petitioner, No. 2:10-cv-3200 JAM JFM (HC)

ORDER

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

statement of non-opposition. Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. DATED: April 7, 2011.

12 rami3200.46osc

2