California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. Butte County Department of Public Works et al

Filing 9

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 04/15/11 ORDERING that dfts shall file a responsive pleading by 05/30/11; the Status Conference is CONTINUED to 07/05/11 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 4 (LKK) before Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton.; the parties shall file a joint status report 14 days prior. (Benson, A.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 BRUCE S. ALPERT (SB#075684) Butte County Counsel KATHLEEN KEHOE GREESON (SB#210552) Deputy County Counsel 25 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 (530) 538-7621 Attorneys for Defendants COUNTY OF BUTTE 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE 11 Plaintiff, 12 -v13 14 BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, et al. 15 Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:10-CV-03203-LKK-KJM JOINT STIPULATION TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING BY MAY 30, 2011AND CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE Judge: Hon. Lawrence K. Karlton 16 17 The parties to the above-entitled action hereby stipulate that good cause exists to continue the 18 Status Conference currently scheduled for May 16, 2011, and extend the due date for Defendants to 19 file a responsive pleading. The parties are actively engaged in settlement discussions, and have 20 completed an informal settlement-protected site inspection. The parties are continuing to make 21 progress on their settlement discussions and request this additional time with the intention of 22 resolving the remaining differences. 23 Pursuant to Local Rule 143(b), the parties present the following stipulation for consideration 24 25 by the court. 26 The Complaint in this action was filed on November 30, 2010. The parties previously 27 stipulated that the undersigned counsel for Defendants accepted service for all defendants, with such 28 service deemed effective March 25, 2011. The parties previously stipulated that Defendants’ 1 2 3 responsive pleading was to be filed on or before April 15, 2011. Counsel for Plaintiff and Defendants are presently discussing settlement terms and have made progress towards resolving this case without further judicial involvement. Thus, the parties 4 also stipulate to extending the date of the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference and the Status 5 6 Report due fourteen days prior to such Status Conference. By order of the Court, a Status 7 Conference is set for May 16, 2011 at 10:00 AM. The parties would prefer to focus their resources 8 on resolving this case. As such, the parties respectfully request that the May 16, 2011 Status 9 (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference be continued until a date no sooner that fourteen (14) days from the 10 11 time Defendants have filed their responsive pleading. The parties respectfully request that the Court grant this stipulation and sign the order below 12 13 14 15 reflecting these new dates. SO STIPULATED. Respectfully Submitted, 16 DATED: April 13, 2011 17 18 /s/ Kathleen Kehoe Greeson By: Kathleen Kehoe Greeson, Deputy County Counsel Attorney for Defendants BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, MIKE CRUMP, AND SHAWN H. O’BRIEN 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 BRUCE S. ALPERT COUNTY COUNSEL DATED: April 13, 2011 JACKSON & TUERCK /s/ Robert J. Tuerck Robert J. Tuerck Attorney for Plaintiff CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE 1 ORDER 2 Based upon the foregoing Stipulation and good cause appearing therefore: 3 1. Defendants shall file a responsive pleading on or before May 30, 2011; 3. The Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference currently set for May 16, 2011 at 10:00 4 5 a.m. shall be continued until July 5, 2011 at 1:30 p.m. and 6 7 8 9 4. The parties shall file a Joint Status Report with the court no later than fourteen (14) days preceding the Status Conference. IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: April 15, 2011.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?