Jones v. Sahota et al

Filing 126

ORDER denying 125 Motion for a deposition transcript signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/19/12. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HENRY A. JONES, 11 Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 No. 2:10-cv-3206 MCE EFB P SAHOTA, et al., ORDER Defendants. 14 / 15 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 16 17 U.S.C. § 1983. This order concerns plaintiff’s “motion for complete disposition taken of 18 plaintiff,” which the court construes as a request for a deposition transcript. Dckt. No. 125. The 19 officer before whom a deposition is taken must retain stenographic notes of the proceedings. 20 Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(f)(3). “When paid reasonable charges, the officer must furnish a copy of the 21 transcript . . . to any party or deponent.” Id. Thus, after plaintiff pays for a copy of his 22 deposition transcript, he may then obtain it from the officer before whom the deposition was 23 taken. Plaintiff cites to no authority suggesting that either the court or the defendants, should 24 instead be forced to bear this cost. 25 //// 26 //// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for a deposition 2 transcript (Dckt. No. 125) is denied. 3 DATED: December 19, 2012. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?