Jones v. Sahota et al

Filing 36

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 8/31/11 ORDERING that Plaintiff has 20 days from the date of this order either to explain his failure to comply with the 8/12/11 order, or to submit two copies of his amended complaint. Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The Clerk is directed to send Plaintiff one copy of the 2/9/11 pleading.(Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HENRY A. JONES, Plaintiff, 11 12 vs. 13 No. CIV S-10-3206 MCE EFB P SAHOTA, et al., Defendants. 14 ORDER / 15 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 17 U.S.C. ยง 1983. On August 12, 2011, the court directed plaintiff to submit two copies of the 18 February 9, 2011 endorsed amended for the U. S. Marshal to serve defendants. Plaintiff 19 submitted no copies. He has failed to comply with the order. 20 It therefore is ORDERED that plaintiff has 20 days from the date of this order either to 21 explain his failure to comply with the August 12, 2011 order, or to submit two copies of his 22 amended complaint. Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this 23 action be dismissed. The Clerk is directed to send to plaintiff one copy of the February 9, 2011 24 pleading. 25 DATED: August 31, 2011. 26 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HENRY A. JONES, Plaintiff, 11 12 vs. 13 No. CIV S-10-3206 MCE EFB P SAHOTA, et al., Defendants. 14 / 15 Plaintiff hereby submits the following documents in compliance with the court's order 16 17 NOTICE OF SUBMISSION OF DOCUMENTS : filed 2 18 copies of the February 9, 2011 First Amended Complaint 19 Dated: 20 Plaintiff 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?