Jones v. Sahota et al

Filing 54

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/5/11 DENYING 37 and 52 Motions to Appoint Counsel. (Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 HENRY A. JONES, Plaintiff, 10 11 vs. 12 No. CIV S-10-3206 MCE EFB P SAHOTA, et al., Defendants. 13 ORDER / 14 15 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 16 U.S.C. § 1983. He has requested that the court appoint counsel. Dckt. Nos. 37, 52. District 17 courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in section 1983 cases. 18 Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In exceptional circumstances, 19 the court may request counsel voluntarily to represent such a plaintiff. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1); 20 Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 21 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). 22 While attachments to plaintiff’s filings demonstrate he suffers from significant mental 23 illnesses and cognitive limitations, the court finds that at this juncture, there is no indication that 24 plaintiff’s mental illnesses constitute “exceptional circumstances” in comparison to the many 25 other uneducated prisoner pro se litigants who litigate in this court. 26 //// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s September 6, 2011 and 2 November 21, 2011 motions for appointment of counsel (Dckt. Nos. 37, 52) are denied. 3 DATED: December 5, 2011. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?