Sacramento Kings Limited Partnership, L.P. v. M-F Athletic Company, Inc. et al.

Filing 52

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 3/5/12 ORDERING that the parties have filed a stipulated request to continue scheduled dates pending consolidation of this case with related case, Garcia v. M-F Athletic Company, Inc., Civ.S. 11- 2430 WBS GGH. The undersigned is unable to approve the proposed dates because they will interfere with the currently scheduled pretrial conference and trial dates, which can only be rescheduled by the district judge. The parties are directed to bring such a proposal before the district judge; Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: the proposed joint stipulation to continue current status order, filed 3/2/12, 51 is denied without prejudice. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SACRAMENTO KINGS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, L.P., 11 Plaintiff, No. CIV S-10-3210 WBS GGH 12 vs. 13 14 15 M-F ATHLETIC COMPANY, INC. dba PERFORM BETTER LEDRAPLASTIC S.P.A., et al., 16 Defendants. ORDER 17 / 18 The parties have filed a stipulated request to continue scheduled dates pending 19 consolidation of this case with related case, Garcia v. M-F Athletic Company, Inc., Civ.S. 11- 20 2430 WBS GGH. The undersigned is unable to approve the proposed dates because they will 21 interfere with the currently scheduled pretrial conference and trial dates, which can only be 22 rescheduled by the district judge. The parties are directed to bring such a proposal before the 23 district judge. 24 \\\\\ 25 \\\\\ 26 \\\\\ 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: the proposed joint stipulation to continue 2 current status order, filed March 2, 2012, (dkt. no. 51), is denied without prejudice. 3 Dated: March 5, 2012 4 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 5 6 GGH:076 SacKings3210.so.den.wpd 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?