Adams v. Wilkens et al

Filing 21

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 05/13/11 ordering that petitioner show cause within 21 days why respondents' motion to dismiss should not be granted. (Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

JIMMIE LEE ADAMS,

11

Petitioner,

12
13

No. 2:10-cv-3220 JFM (HC)

vs.
WARDEN NIMROD-COOK,
et al.,

14
Respondents.
15

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
/

16

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with an application for writ of

17

habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On April 11, 2011, respondents filed a motion to

18

dismiss. Petitioner has not filed an opposition to the motion. Local Rule 230(l) provides in part:

19

“Failure of the responding party to file written opposition or to file a statement of no opposition

20

may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion . . . .”

21

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner show cause,

22

within twenty-one days, why respondents’ motion to dismiss should not be granted. Petitioner is

23

/////

24

/////

25

/////

26

/////
1

1

cautioned that failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action

2

be dismissed.

3

DATED: May 13, 2011.

4
5
6
7
8

12
adam3220.46osc

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2