Pasion v. Haviland et al

Filing 122

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/28/16 GRANTING 120 Motion for Extension of time. The parties are granted an extension of 7 days from the date of this order to address the deadlines and issues discussed in this Court's Minute Order from June 27, 2015.(Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Stacy Hovan (Bar No. 271485) HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP 4085 Campbell Avenue, Suite 100 Menlo Park, California 94025 Telephone: (650) 463-4000 Facsimile: (650) 463-4199 stacy.hovan@hoganlovells.com Michael J. Shepard (Bar No. 91281) Samuel R. Welch (Bar No. 300596) HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP 3 Embarcadero Center, Suite 1500 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 374-2300 Facsimile: (415) 374-2499 michael.shepard@hoganlovells.com samuel.welch@hoganlovells.com Attorneys for Plaintiff GEORGE M. PASION 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 15 GEORGE M. PASION, 16 Plaintiff, 17 v. 18 JOHN A. HAVILAND, et al., 19 Case No. 10-cv-3227 TLN AC (PC) ORDER GRANTING EX PARTE REQUEST FOR INITIAL EXTENSION OF TIME Defendant. Trial Date: May 1, 2017 Action Filed: December 2, 2010 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 H OGAN L OVELLS US LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SILICON VALLEY [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 10-CV-3227 TLN AC (PC) 1 The Court, having considered Plaintiff George M. Pasion’s ex parte request for an initial 2 extension of time and the supporting Declaration of Stacy Hovan, HEREBY ORDERS that the 3 parties are granted an extension of seven (7) days from the date of this order to address the 4 deadlines and issues discussed in this Court’s Minute Order from June 27, 2015. See Dkt. 5 No. 119. 6 7 Dated: July 28, 2016 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 H OGAN L OVELLS US LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SILICON VALLEY -2- [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 10-CV-3227 TLN AC (PC)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?