Pasion v. Haviland et al

Filing 92

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 7/28/2015 ORDERING that Dalton McGuire's 84 Motion to Quash is GRANTED and the summons served on Dalton McGuire is QUASHED. Defendant David McGuire shall respond to plaintiff's third amended complaint within twenty-one days of the filing of this order. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GEORGE M. PASION, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:10-cv-3227 AC P v. ORDER JOHN A. HAVILAND, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a former state prisoner proceeding through counsel with a civil rights action 17 18 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the court is Dalton McGuire’s motion to quash. 19 ECF No. 84. In his motion, Mr. McGuire states that he is not the D. McGuire named in the complaint 20 21 and that he has never worked at the Solano State Prison. ECF No. 84. Plaintiff has responded that 22 the summons served on Mr. McGuire was served in the mistaken belief that Mr. McGuire was the 23 D. McGuire in the complaint. ECF No. 90. He agrees that Dalton McGuire is not a party to this 24 case and the summons issued to him should be quashed. Id. at 2. Plaintiff also states that the 25 notice of service filed with the court (ECF No. 86) was served on David McGuire, who is the 26 correct defendant. Id. Based on the foregoing, the court will quash the summons served on 27 Dalton McGuire and set a deadline for David McGuire to answer the complaint. 28 //// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. Dalton McGuire’s motion to quash (ECF No. 84) is granted and the summons served 3 4 on Dalton McGuire is quashed. 2. Defendant David McGuire shall respond to plaintiff’s third amended complaint within 5 twenty-one days of the filing of this order. 6 DATED: July 28, 2015 7 ___________/S/ Allison Claire__________ ALLISON CLAIRE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?